Was the defeat at Little Bighorn all Custer’s fault?

Why Custer was not entirely  at fault:

The two  other army formations failed to reach the battle. Gibbon was far behind and  late, and Crook was defeated and had retreated leaving Custer to his fate.

The Little Bighorn gathering of Indian was the  largest ever seen. Over seven thousand Indians and two thousand warriors. Such  villages were unheard of.

The  Indian leaders were brilliant tactical warlords. Crazy Horse was a fabled  warrior leader, and Sitting Bull had been  able to unite more Indians than previously thought possible.

 

Why Custer must bear the  blame:

Custer had a reputation for reckless decisions and  hotheadedness in battle. He often put his men in danger in his quest for glory.  He has passed out bottom of the class at Officer Training at West Point.

Custer  ignored orders to wait for Gibbon before attacking. He bullied his men on and  on. His men were exhausted by the time the battle was started.

Custer  chose to ignore the scouts he had sent out. They told him he had insufficient bullets, and that the Indians were too many to defeat. Custer also failed to  scout the ground properly.

Custer  had crucially divided his men in two. He failed to support Reno and Benteen when  their first attack was driven back. He changed his battle plan without telling  the other officers.

Weblinks | Key dates | 1876 Battle of  Little Bighorn | Biography: Custer | Biography: Sitting Bull |

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>